6/28/2023 0 Comments The modern denial of human nature![]() Comparative Literature Studies Penn State University Press Hokenson's epilogue credits contemporaries with beginning to restore unity to In this chapter, she discusses various extensions of earlier theories, feminist theories, and theories that return to reason and system as a way to understand what belongs to comedy and the spectator's response to it. Aesthetics returns again to comic theory, though hardly in traditional ways. Her concluding sixth chapter, entitled "Comedy in Contemporary Thought," briefly treats promising recent developments that aim to provide a connection to comic texts that was lacking in postmodernism. ![]() ![]() According to this view, only language holds sway, and there is no real "I" or "we." She sees these primarily French writers (Hokenson's first expertise is French language and literature) as "extreme refinements of the populist view," except that here theory itself is insurgent (204). ![]() I doubt whether postmodernists would look kindly on the title of chapter 5, "The Interlude of Postmodernist Conceptions." While the modernists' difficulty lay in fitting a large number of texts into their global theories, Hokenson claims that the postmodernists "rarely seek to avoid by discussion of large numbers of comic texts," opting instead to select a very few and only those that match their philosophical view (193). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (review) The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (review) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |